<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brainstorming a story idea (the mess of it)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.owlspotting.com/2006/05/18/brainstorming-and-the-birth-of-story-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.owlspotting.com/2006/05/18/brainstorming-and-the-birth-of-story-ideas/</link>
	<description>Writings and whereabouts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.owlspotting.com/2006/05/18/brainstorming-and-the-birth-of-story-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 23:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owlspotting.com/2006/05/18/brainstorming-a-story-idea-the-mess-of-it/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this helps, but the girls who populate the Luckymag.com message boards will go from talking about $200 jeans like Seven for Mankind or whatever and then talk about something they got at Target. They wear all of this together in outfits, I gather.

It&#039;s funny, because right before I read this, I bought some shoes at Target. $8. Check it out: http://tinyurl.com/ho7ou.

One of the user comments on the shoes says she saw some &quot;just like them&quot; on a celebrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this helps, but the girls who populate the Luckymag.com message boards will go from talking about $200 jeans like Seven for Mankind or whatever and then talk about something they got at Target. They wear all of this together in outfits, I gather.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, because right before I read this, I bought some shoes at Target. $8. Check it out: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ho7ou" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ho7ou</a>.</p>
<p>One of the user comments on the shoes says she saw some &#8220;just like them&#8221; on a celebrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romerican</title>
		<link>http://www.owlspotting.com/2006/05/18/brainstorming-and-the-birth-of-story-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Romerican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owlspotting.com/2006/05/18/brainstorming-a-story-idea-the-mess-of-it/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>I have to side with the furness here.  Target is definitely low culture.  And I firmly believe the BrandCentral campaign is a very tongue-in-cheek homage to the &quot;hipness&quot; of Target.

In the real world, folks have been calling it Targèt for decades.  Making fun of themselves for shopping there (to benefit from cheap prices).  It was a humorous way to pretend Target was really a high end Targèt.

So, this campaign takes a previously existing pop culture joke about the crappiness of Target, then puts a large price tag on it.  

But who&#039;s going to buy this stuff?  &quot;Rebellious&quot; teenagers of the nouveau riche?  &#039;Look, I&#039;m rich enough to make fun of you poor people and yet it&#039;s kinda clever because MTV told me it was.&#039;  

Will it work? Sure, there&#039;s enough bubbleheads with cash to ring up a tidy profit.  I give mad props to BrandCentral&#039;s dashing creativity in new ways to pilfer value out of dried up culture.  And a hat tip to Target for its willingness to make fun of itself as high culture when it *is* low culture all in the name of making a couple bucks... which may, in some ways, actually raise the brand up from the dredges a little on the scale of cultural value (ironically, probably the full purpose to make fun of the rich making fun of the poor like the webs we weave).  Interesting business; the rubber band of brand.

Reminds me of the monologue delivered when Joe Pesci&#039;s character cracks in JFK.  Who&#039;s fucking who?  Nobody knows.

I wouldn&#039;t be caught dead in that crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to side with the furness here.  Target is definitely low culture.  And I firmly believe the BrandCentral campaign is a very tongue-in-cheek homage to the &#8220;hipness&#8221; of Target.</p>
<p>In the real world, folks have been calling it Targèt for decades.  Making fun of themselves for shopping there (to benefit from cheap prices).  It was a humorous way to pretend Target was really a high end Targèt.</p>
<p>So, this campaign takes a previously existing pop culture joke about the crappiness of Target, then puts a large price tag on it.  </p>
<p>But who&#8217;s going to buy this stuff?  &#8220;Rebellious&#8221; teenagers of the nouveau riche?  &#8216;Look, I&#8217;m rich enough to make fun of you poor people and yet it&#8217;s kinda clever because MTV told me it was.&#8217;  </p>
<p>Will it work? Sure, there&#8217;s enough bubbleheads with cash to ring up a tidy profit.  I give mad props to BrandCentral&#8217;s dashing creativity in new ways to pilfer value out of dried up culture.  And a hat tip to Target for its willingness to make fun of itself as high culture when it *is* low culture all in the name of making a couple bucks&#8230; which may, in some ways, actually raise the brand up from the dredges a little on the scale of cultural value (ironically, probably the full purpose to make fun of the rich making fun of the poor like the webs we weave).  Interesting business; the rubber band of brand.</p>
<p>Reminds me of the monologue delivered when Joe Pesci&#8217;s character cracks in JFK.  Who&#8217;s fucking who?  Nobody knows.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead in that crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
